Clinical Practice Supports image

Simulation Learning

Evidence-informed information and resources for simulation-based education

Introduction

What is simulation learning?

Created in Canva. All images used under terms of the Canva license.

Terminology

There is inconsistent and variable terminology used within simulation literature, among professions, and across geographic locations, which can create confusion among both facilitators and participants using SBE. You will note these variations in terminology within the guide and in the associated resources.

This guide was designed for individuals both in an educational setting and a clinical practice setting, and therefore participants are from a variety of backgrounds.

  • The term facilitator describes those who facilitate SBE, including educators, instructors, faculty, simulationists, debriefers, etc. 
  • The term participant describes individuals participating in SBE, including learners, students, etc.
  • The term simulation-based education describes all simulation-based experience or activities that occur in healthcare simulation.

Components of Simulation

Simulation is composed of 3 components:

  • prebrief 
  • simulated activity
  • debrief.

Each of these components is guided by evidence-informed best-practice standards and will be explored in subsequent sections of this guide. In the preparation and planning stage, facilitators are required to engage in multiple activities prior to the delivery of a simulated experience. These include:

  • conducting a needs assessment
  • developing the simulated case scenario
  • securing resources (e.g., personnel, space, equipment, etc.)

©2024 Nova Scotia Health.

Standards of Best Practice

Standards of best practice are present in most areas in healthcare and within all healthcare professions. Standards of best practice are generally formed and agreed upon by experts in a specific field or on a specific topic. They are guidelines on the best way of doing something.

The Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best practice™ (HSSOBP™) serve as a guide for integrating evidence-informed best practices in simulation-based education within academia, clinical practice and research (Watt et al., 2021). These standards were previously referred to as the International Nursing Association of Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standards.

HSSOBP™ are designed to be relevant across all healthcare professions and in all simulation-based activities, regardless of the setting. They consist of 10 standards and a glossary of terms. Each article explains the standard, the background information that underpins the standard, and the criterion required to meet it (Watt et al., 2021). You will be introduced to many of these standards throughout various sections in this guide. The HSSOBP™ provides literature to support best simulation practices for the following individual standards:

  • Professional Development
  • Prebriefing: Preparation and Briefing
  • Simulation Design
  • Facilitation
  • The Debriefing Process
  • Operations
  • Outcomes and Objectives
  • Professional Integrity
  • Sim-Enhanced IPE (Sim-IPE)
  • Evaluation of Learning and Performance
  • Simulation Glossary

(Watt et al., 2021)

Other commonly used standards that guide simulation-based education include:

  • The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice
  • The Society for Simulation in Healthcare (SSH) Accreditation Standards
  • The Association for Simulated Practice in Healthcare (ASPiH) Standards for Simulation-Based Education
  • The National Nursing League (NLN) Jeffries Simulation Framework

Healthcare simulation is guided by the Healthcare Simulationist Code of Ethics, which highlights key aspirational values for the practice of simulation:

  • Integrity
  • Transparency
  • Mutual respect
  • Professionalism accountability
  • Results orientation

Psychological Safety

Psychological safety in SBE refers to an explicit or implicit feeling that participants are comfortable participating, sharing thoughts, speaking up, and discussing mistakes without fear of repercussion or embarrassment. SBE involves interpersonal risk-taking (Lioce et al, 2020). Learners are more likely to participate when they feel psychologically safe. It allows them to embrace vulnerability and being uncomfortable which can enhance their learning.

Watch:

 

  Building a Psychologically Safe Workplace

TEDx Talks,2014.

 


In simulation-based education, learners require:

  • information on prerequisite knowledge and skills for the simulation
  • orientation to both space and equipment
  • clear learning objectives that link the simulation both to the objectives and to relevant clinical practice
  • information on the process of simulation (prebrief, simulation, debriefing and reflection on practice)

Creating a ‘safe container’ for learning also includes establishing a fiction contract with the learners, attending to logistical details, and both declaring and enacting a commitment to respecting learners and showing concern for their psychological safety (Rudolph, Raemer, & Simon, 2014). Specific strategies to promote psychological safety will be discussed throughout this guide.

Purdy and colleagues (2022) expand on the idea of the ‘safe container’ to recognize that facilitators cannot ensure a safe environment for all participants in every situation, despite best efforts. Prior simulation and past life experiences, personal attributes and behaviours, and confidence levels influence how participants react and feel during simulation.

We should note that we cannot ensure that all participants feel psychologically safe. Facilitators should not present the simulation environment as an all-inclusive, safe space. To do so can worsen the impacts on participants who do not feel psychologically safe. Facilitators must also be prepared to address safety concerns. This may include: 

  • Implementing a ‘safe word’ for any participant to use to halt the simulation if they are feeling unsafe, distressed or in the event of an emergency. For example, a safe word may be deployed in the event of an emergency to indicate that it is not part of the simulation, or if a participant feels unsafe or distressed because of the SBE activity content.
  • Applying policies and procedures related to code of conduct and safety in the workplace.
  • Being aware of other resources that participants may need to access, such as counselling services or employee assistance programs.

Fidelity

Fidelity refers to the extent to which various aspects of simulation combine to imitate reality (Lavoie et al., 2020). Fidelity may also be referred to as realism or authenticity. When designing a Simulation-Based Experience (SBE), an appropriate fidelity (level of realism) should be identified to meet the learning objectives/outcomes. Higher fidelity does not equate to better learning.

Types of Fidelity

Fidelity includes physical, conceptual, and psychological dimensions (Lavoie et al., 2020; Campbell et al., 2023). All three aspects work together to enhance realism and participants' engagement.

  • Physical/Environmental Fidelity: The degree to which the experience replicates the appearance of a real-life situation. Physical fidelity includes the modality (e.g., standardized patient or patient simulator/mannikin), the equipment, related props, embedded participants, and the use of moulage. Examples include in-situ versus simulation lab setting, using equipment that matches that of the clinical environment, or using moulage to enhance realism.
  • Conceptual Fidelity: Ensures that the simulation scenario makes sense and is realistic. For example, the vital signs and lab results reflect the diagnosis presented in the scenario.
  • Psychological/Emotional Fidelity: The extent to which the simulation scenario evokes underlying emotions, feelings, beliefs, and self-awareness in the learners. Examples include the use of realistic conversation with family members and patients, time pressures, and competing priorities. (Watts et al., 2021)

Levels of Fidelity (realism)

  • Low fidelity simulations lack components that can make them feel like real-world situations. Examples include the use of partial task trainers or static manikins to perform tasks or skills, or unfolding case-studies for table-top discussions.
  • Moderate fidelity simulations are more realistic than low fidelity, but less than high fidelity options. Examples include using manikins that produce heart sounds, bowel sounds, and lung sounds to assist learners with solving problems, performing skills (such as IV insertions, injections, nasogastric tube insertion, tracheostomy suctioning and Foley catheter insertions) and making decisions.
  • High fidelity simulations are the most realistic. Examples include using complex manikins (full body computerized manikins) or standardized patients to provide increased realism. High fidelity manikins or patients may respond verbally to learners and interventions. This allows learners to develop communication and problem-solving skills.

Modality

Select the tabs for examples and images of simulation modalities 

Modality refers to the medium used to deliver simulation-based education, regardless of the level of realism. When designing a simulation, it is most important to consider the appropriate simulation modality required to meet the learning objectives and outcomes (Foronda et al., 2020; Jeffries et al., 2016; & Watts et al., 2021).

Nursing Anne simulator manikin

Nursing Anne Simulator. Photo ©Nova Scotia Health.

SimMan 3G+ simulator - exterior. Photo ©Nova Scotia Health.

SimMan 3G+ simulator - interior. Photo ©Nova Scotia Health.

Airway task trainer. Photo ©Nova Scotia Health.

IV arm task trainer that simulates blood flow. Photo ©Nova Scotia Health.

Simulated or Standardized Patients are actors who follow scripts to play the role of real patients in either a live or virtual environment. Simulated / Standardized Patients are trained to offer a consistent experience for different learners, allowing for measurable outcomes in a scenario.

Virtual Reality or Augmented Reality Simulation provides a three-dimensional (3D) experience using:

  • Head-mounted Display Virtual Reality (HMD VR) 
  • haptic enhanced task trainers 
  • computer screen-based immersive rooms
  • interactive clinical case scenarios with branching case structure

A screenshot of a virtual reality computer program showing a patient in an emergency department examination bay.

A screenshot of a virtual reality computer program.

Figure 1: Avatar patient in an emergency department examination bay, by Jillian McGrath, et al., is licensed CC BY 4.0

Goggles used in augmented reality simulation.

An example of goggles used in augmented reality simulation. 

NEXUS OF XR VR HEADSETS by TimPreslandAUS, is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

Cadaveric or animal specimens can be used for higher fidelity skills practice when manikins and task trainers lack the necessary realism. For example, learners may benefit from practicing certain surgical skills on real tissues before attempting the skills on a patient.

Tabletop or case-based simulation might include:

  • description of patient encounters (case studies)
  • board games
  • other interactive exploration of a case
Hybrid simulation modalities combine two or more other modalities. For example, a mannikin may include a standardized patient voice feature (Watts et al., 2021).

Virtual Simulation

What is Virtual Simulation?

Virtual simulation is a relatively new methodology in simulation-based education (SBE). Currently, there is no standardized or broadly accepted definition of virtual simulation. Various definitions and terms are used inconsistently and interchangeably (Foronda, 2021; Lioce, 2020; Molley et al., 2021). Virtual simulation is sometimes referred to as virtual ‘gaming’ or ‘v-sim’ (Molloy et al., 2021).

As an umbrella term, virtual simulation includes any simulation-based learning activity designed to provide an experience through the direct or assisted-use of an electronic medium (Molloy et al., 2021). The simulation modality itself is virtual with images and interactions generated by computer software. Examples include:

  • Enhanced reality technologies such as: 
    • Virtual reality
    • Augmented reality
    • Mixed reality
  • Screen-based simulations delivered on a standard computer or tablet screen. 

Variations in the ways people define virtual simulation include: 

  • Defining virtual simulation as using partial immersion through a digital learning environment such as a computer, tablet, phone, or other screen, to create a perceived lived experience for an intended outcome. (Foronda 2021)
  • Describing virtual simulation in terms of:
    • fidelity (realism)
    • immersion (level of interactivity)
    • how people are represented (e.g., videos or avatars) (Cant et al., 2019) 

 

Trends

In recent years, virtual simulation has dramatically increased in popularity. During the COVID-19 pandemic it was widely used to provide meaningful learning that replicated clinical learning experiences to meet established objectives (Cowperthwait et al., 2021).

Educators often use virtual simulation that is based on well-defined objectives and clinical competencies to digitally simulate clinical experiences (Verkuyl et al., 2022).

 

Benefits 

The use of virtual simulation-based training continues to expand. It has been validated as an effective tool that helps learners develop the knowledge and skills required for the practice setting. Recognized benefits of virtual simulation include: 

  • Reducing resource barriers, such as the cost of training and physical space requirements
  • Providing learners with a range of opportunities that might be difficult to access in the real world, such as high-acuity, low-occurrence events. (Stevens and Kincaid, 2015; Verkuyl et al., 2022) 

Virtual simulation can be used:

  • To apply knowledge. Ideally, participants are exposed to new content prior to the experience. 
  • Before an in-person experience, to prepare participants to apply their knowledge in a face-to-face simulation. 
  • For ‘just in time learning’ or ‘in-situ learning,’ before a particular clinical situation.

Assess the benefit of virtual simulation for learners before incorporating it into the curriculum. Virtual simulation should not be added as an isolated activity; it is more effective when paired with other activities or modalities to maximize benefit. 

Watch the following four-minute video on integrating virtual gaming simulation into curriculum:

There are a variety of virtual simulation modalities. Virtual simulation can be done: 

  • Synchronously (where the facilitator and learner(s) are together in real time)
  • Asynchronously (where learners independently access the simulation)
  • As an individual
  • In groups of learners

The choice of the virtual simulation modality should depend on the learning outcomes and learners’ needs. Virtual simulation can be designed to facilitate uniprofessional teamwork or interprofessional collaboration, where learners access the same scenario and must work together within the simulation (Verkuyl et al., 2022).

The three components of the simulation process also occur in virtual simulation:

  • prebriefing
  • the simulation activity
  • debriefing

Considerations for maintaining a psychologically safe learning environment in virtual simulation activities are paramount. Information on strategies for debriefing after a virtual simulation experience can be found in the debriefing section (Cheng et al., 2020). 

The following video demonstrates an example of virtual simulation: 

  Body Interact Virtual Patient Simulator | IMSH 2019 Video Demo

HealthySimulation – Medical Simulation Resources, 2019.

For more information on virtual simulation review the open access e-textbook, Virtual Simulation: An Educator's Toolkit. This is a helpful resource for educators and simulationists who use, or would like to use, virtual simulation. It highlights key concepts on the following stages required for effective virtual-simulation learning experiences:

  • educator preparation
  • prebrief
  • enactment
  • debrief
  • evaluation

You may also wish to review the following: 

1. Cant, R., Cooper, S., Sussex, R., & Bogossian, F. (2019). What’s in a name? Clarifying the nomenclature of virtual simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.11.003

2. Cheng, A., Kolbe, M., Grant, V., Eller S., Hales R., Symon, B., Griswold, S., and Eppich, W. (2020). A practical guide to virtual debriefings: communities of inquiry perspective. Advances in Simulation 5(18). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-020-00141-1

3. Cowperthwait, A., Graber, J., Carlsen, A., Cowperthwait, M., and Mekulski, H. (2021). Innovations in virtual education for clinical and simulation learning. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(5),1011-1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.06.010

4. Foronda, C. L. (2021). What is virtual simulation? Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 52, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.12.004

5. Foronda, C. L., Fernandez-Burgos, M., Nadeau, C., Kelley, C. N., & Henry, M. N. (2020). Virtual simulation in nursing education: A systematic review spanning 1996 to 2018. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 15(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411

6. Foronda, C. L., Gonzalez, L., Meese, M. M., Slamon, N., Baluyot, M., Lee, J., & Aebersold, M. (2024). A comparison of virtual reality to traditional simulation in health professions education: A systematic review. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 19(1S), S90–S97. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000745

7. Lioce, L., Lopreiato, J., Downing, D., Chang, T. P., Robertson, J. M., Anderson, M., Diaz D. A., and Spain A. E. and the Terminology and Concepts Working Group. (2020). Healthcare simulation dictionary. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://doi.org/10.23970/simulationv2

8. Molloy, M.A., Holt, J., Charnetski, M. & Rossler, K. (2021). Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice &trade Simulation glossary. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.017.

Stevens, J.A., & Kincaid, J.P. (2015). The relationship between presence and performance in virtual simulation training. Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 3, 41-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojmsi.2015.32005

10. Verkuyl, M., Atack, L., Kamstra, C. K., & Mastrilli, P. (2020). Virtual gaming simulation: An interview study of nurse educators in its current form for publication. Simulation & Gaming, 51(4), 537-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120904399

11. Verkuyl, M., Taplay, K., Atack, L., Boulet, M., Dubois, N., Goldsworthy, S., Merwin, T., Willett, T., & Job, T. (2022). Virtual simulation: An educator's toolkit. Centennial College. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/vlsvstoolkit/

Additional Resources

 

  SimEd Network Celebration (Long)

Dalhousie University, 2023.

The following video was produced for Healthcare Simulation Week to promote simulation throughout Nova Scotia:

References

Foronda, C. L., Fernandez-Burgos, M., Kelley, C. N., & Henry, M. N. (2020). Virtual simulation in nursing education: A systematic review spanning 1996-2018. Simulation in Healthcare, 15(1), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411

Gaba, D.M. (2004, October). The future vision of simulation in health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(suppl 1), i2-i10. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009878

Hetzel Campbell, S., Harder, N., Luctkar-flude, M., & Tyerman, J. (2023). Simulation in Canadian Nursing Education. Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing.

INACSL Standards Committee, Miller, C., Deckers, C., Jones, M., Wells-Beede, E., & McGee, E. (2021). Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice™ Outcomes and Objectives. Clinical Simulation in Nursing.58, 40-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.013

Jeffries, P. R., Swoboda, S. M., & Akintade, B. (2016). Teaching and learning using simulations. In D.M. Billings & J.A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (5th ed., pp. 304-323). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

Lavoie, P., Deschênes, M.-F., Nolin, R., Bélisle, M., Blanchet Garneau, A., Boyer, L., Lapierre, A., & Fernandez, N. (2020). Beyond Technology: A Scoping Review of Features that Promote Fidelity and Authenticity in Simulation-Based Health Professional Education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing ,42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.02.001

Lopreiato, J., Downing, D., & Gammon, W. (2016, October 1). Healthcare Simulation Dictionary.https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/resources/simulation/terms.html

McGrath, J., Kman, N., Danforth, D., Bahner, D. P., Khandelwal, S., Martin, D. R., Nagel, R., Verbeck, N., Way, D. P., & Nelson, R. (2015). Figure 1: Avatar patient in an emergency department examination bay[Image]. Virtual alternative to the oral examination for emergency medicine residents. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 16(2), 336-343. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24344

Mitchell, S., Blanchard, E., Curran, V., Hoadley, T., Donoghue, A., & Lockey, A. (2024, January). Effects of simulation fidelity on health care providers on team training: A Systematic Review. Simulation in Healthcare : Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 19(1S), S50-S56. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000762

Park, C. S., Murphy, T. F., & the Code of Ethics Working Group (2018). Healthcare Simulationist Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047

Rudolph, J. W., Raemer, D. B., & Simon, R. (2014). Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: The role of the presimulation briefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 9(6), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047

Rudolph, J.W., Simon, R., Dufresne, R. L., & Ramer, D.B. (2007). Debriefing with good judgment: Combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiology Clinics. 25(2), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.007

Spurr, J. & Brazil, V. (Hosts). (2016, October 14). The Safe Container for Simulation (No. 8) [Audio podcast episode]. In Simulcast. https://simulationpodcast.com/8-safe-container-simulation/

Watts, P.I, McDermott, D.S., Alinier, G., Charnetski, M., Ludlow, J., Horsley, E., Meakim, C., & Nawathe, P. (2021). Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice® Simulation Design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.009p>

Watts, P. I., Rossler, K., Bowler, F., Miller, C., Charnetski, M., Decker, S., Molloy, M. A., Persico, L., McMahon, E., McDermott, D., & Hallmark, B. (2021). Onward and Upward: Introducing the Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice™. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58,1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.006

Wilson, L., & Wittman-Price, R.A. (2019). Review Manual for the Certified healthcare Educator (CHSE) Exam (2nd ed). Springer.p>